M. RAMASWAMY VS COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
1998 P T D 347
[223 I T R 97]
[Madras High Court (India)]
Before K.A. Swami, CJ. and Raju, J
M. RAMASWAMY
versus
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
Tax Case No.1416 and Reference No.859 of 1981, decided on 25/09/1995.
Wealth tax---
---Exemption---Growing crops---Coffee---Tea---Two leaves and bud of tea bushes and berries of coffee alone entitled to exemption---Entire coffee and tea bushes not entitled to exemption--Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957. S.5(1)(viii-a).
The entire coffee and tea bushes, apart from the two leaves and a bud of the tea bush and the berries of the coffee bush, do not fall within the expression "growing crops" for exemption under section 5(1)(viii-a) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957.
Rangaswamy (M.) v. CWT (1996) 221 ITR 39 (Mad.) fol.
P.P.S. Janarthana Raja for Subbaraya Aiyar, Padmanabham and Ramamani for the Assessee.
C. V. Rajan for the Commissioner
JUDGMENT
RAJU, J.---The question of law which arises and which has been referred by the Income-tax Tribunal for the consideration of this Court is question No.2. The said question has been the subject-matter of our consideration and decision in Tax Cases Nos. 1463 and 1556 to 1560 of 1981, dated September 25, 1995 M. Rangaswamy v. CWT (1996) 221 ITR 39 (Mad). There is no dispute before us that the ratio of the said decision squarely applies and governs the question raised in the above tax case.
Applying the ratio of the said decision to the facts and circumstances of the case before us and the question referred to this Court, we answer the question in the negative and against the assessee, but in favour of the Revenue and hold that the entire coffee and tea bushes, apart from the two leaves and a bud of the tea bush and the berries of the coffee bush, do not fall within the expression "growing crops" for exemption under section 5(l)(viii-a) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957. No costs.
A.A 198/FCOrder accordingly.