1998 P T D (Trib.) 3746

[Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan]

Before Muhammad Mujibullah Siddiqui, Chairman and Muhammad Mehboob Alam, Accountant Member

M. As. (RECT) NOS.172/KB to 175/KB of 1997-98, decided on 23/02/1998.

Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979)---

----Ss.156 & 13(l)(aa)---Addition---Rectification of mistake---Appeal disposed of ex parte---Appellant pointed out that due to oversight no finding had, been given to the objection relating to addition under S.13(1)(aa) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Such objection having been set aside by the First Appellate Authority, same was maintained by the Appellate Tribunal .

Abdul Tahir, I.T.P. for Appellant.

Misri Ladhani, D.R. for Respondent.

Date of hearing: 26th November, 1997.

ORDER

MUHAMMAD MURBULLAH SIDDIQUI (CHAIRMAN). ---By above applications rectification is sought in our order, dated 13-8-1995 in I.T.As. Nos.227 to 229/KB of 1993-94 and I.T.A. No.2223/KB of 1993-94 relating to the assessment years 1988-89 1989-90, 1990-91 and 1991-92.

2. The main appeals were heard and disposed of on 13-8-1995, ex parte. It is submitted in the rectification applications that the notice was served on the appellant/applicant and he proceeded from Sukkur to Karachi but their car went out of order during journey and, therefore, they could not reach Karachi on the date of hearing. However, no mistake has been pointed out in the common issue contested in all the four years under appeal pertaining to the estimate of sale. Mr. Abdul Tahir has submitted that due to oversight no finding has been given to the objection relating to addition under section 13(1)(aa). This contention is correct. The omission is a mistake apparent on record and, therefore, the issue is being discussed now. A perusal of the grounds of appeal shows that objection was raised to the effect that, "addition under section 13(1)(aa) is without lawful authority". However, a perusal of the first appellate order shows that the learned C.I.T. (A) set aside the issue with certain directions. The appellant did not assail the setting aside of the issue but assailed the addition which was not existing after the setting aside of addition by the learned C.I.T. (A). Since the grounds of appeal is defective, therefore, requires no consideration and as such the direction of learned C.I.T. (A) setting aside the issue relating to addition under section 13(I)(aa) is hereby maintained.

3. The reference applications stand disposed of as above.

C.M.A./568/Trib. Application dismissed.