1998 P T D 830

[221 I T R 534]

[Allahabad High Court (India)]

Before M. Katju and Dr. B. S. Chauhan, JJ

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

versus

DASI RAM SRI KRISHNA

Income-tax Reference No. 282 of 1979, decided on 07/03/1996.

Income-tax---

----Business expenditure---Sales tax liability claimed as deduction---Finding by A.A.C. that there were no genuine sales not disturbed by Tribunal---No question of allowing sales tax liability.

The assessee-firm claimed deduction of a certain sum on account of liability for sales tax in respect of certain sales. Though the Income-tax Officer and the Appellate Assistant Commissioner rejected the claim, the Tribunal allowed the claim since the assessee was following the mercantile system of accounting. On a reference:

Held, that the Tribunal has not disturbed the finding of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner that there was no genuine sale. Hence, the claim of allowing sales tax liability did not arise. The assessee's following the mercantile system was not relevant as there were no sales.

Standing Counsel for the Commissioner.

Nemo for the Assessee.

JUDGMENT

This Income-tax Reference has been made to us under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, referring the following question for our opinion:

"Whether, on the facts and -circumstances of the case, the sum of Rs.18,022 was allowable as a deduction in computing the business income of the assessee?"

We have heard learned standing counsel for the Department. None appears for the assessee, although he has been served with notice.

The assessee is a registered firm and the relevant assessment year is 1972-73. The assessee does business of manufacture and sale of Kolhus, etc. It claimed, inter alia, deduction of Rs.18,022 on account of liability for sales tax in respect of certain sales made to dealers of Bombay. The Income-tax Officer rejected his claim and his order was affirmed by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. The Tribunal, however, held that the claim for sales tax was allowable since the assessee was following the mercantile system of accounting.

We are of the opinion that since the Appellate Assistant Commissioner has held that there is no genuine sale hence the question of allowing sales tax does not arise. The Tribunal did not advert to this aspect of the matter and instead it held that since the assessee was following the mercantile system of accounting the claim was allowable.

In our opinion, since the fording that there were no genuine sales has not been disturbed by the Tribunal, hence, there was no question of allowing the claim of sales tax. Whether the assessee was following the mercantile system or not was not relevant at all when there were no sales.

Hence, we answer the question in the negative, i.e., in favour of the Department and against the assessee.

No order as to costs.

M.B.A./1285/FC Reference answered.