1993 P T D 1393

[200 I T R 206]

[Allahabad High Court (India)]

Before Om Parkash and R.K Gulati, JJ

ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

Versus

BADRI PRASAD KASHI PRASAD

Income-tax Reference No.187 of 1980, decided on 10/08/1992.

Penalty---

---- Concealment of income---Levy of penalty based on addition to income of assessee by I.T.O.---Addition deleted by Tribunal---Levy of penalty was not valid---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.271(1)(c).

Held, that the levy of penalty was based on the addition to income made by the Income-tax Officer. The addition was deleted by the Tribunal. Hence, the Tribunal was justified in cancelling the penalty.

JUDGMENT

At the instance of the Revenue, the following question has been referred to this Court for its opinion:

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in cancelling the penalty of Rs.5,000 imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961?"

The Income-tax Officer' made an addition of Rs.29,673 which was credited to the Amanat Khata by the assessee, rejecting the plea of the assessee that the said amount was held thereby as a trustee. Also penalty to the extent of Rs.5,000 was levied treating that amount as concealed income, .under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. From the order of the Appellate Tribunal, it is amply clear that addition of Rs.29,673 has been deleted. No information has been furnished to us by standing counsel whether the Revenue has gone in reference in the quantum matter and, therefore, the addition of Rs.29,673 having been deleted, the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) cannot survive.

On these facts, we answer the above question in the affirmative, against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee. No order as to costs.

M.BA./2378/TReference answered.